It doesn't make sense.
Because as a new product, the gravitational cube is still in the promotion stage, and consumers have not fully understood and accepted it, it is unreasonable to ask consumers to pay high fees at this time.
This move may lead to consumer disgust and dissatisfaction, which will affect the company's brand image and sales performance.
If the gravitational cube has been recognized by the market, and has established a good reputation and reputation in the market, then the deduction fee of 199 yuan may be more reasonable.
But at this stage, the company can take some promotional measures, such as gifts, trial packages, etc., to attract consumers, increase sales, and slowly build up consumers' trust and loyalty.
It doesn't make sense.
Because the Magic Cube has not been promoted, users do not know about its functions and performance, and charging fees too early is likely to cause user dissatisfaction and complaints, which will seriously affect the reputation and sales of the product.
Whether to charge a fee should be considered after promotion.
At the same time, compulsory deduction may also violate the protection of consumers' rights and need to be treated with caution.
Not enough. Because the gravitational cube has not been promoted, most people do not understand its functions and characteristics, and the deduction fee of 199 yuan is too high, leading to low enthusiasm for users, which affects its marketing and sales results.
In the early stage of product promotion, preferential policies should be provided to potential users to attract more people to use and establish a brand image. At the same time, it is necessary to accurately evaluate the market value and pricing strategy of the product to avoid the occurrence of unsalable products caused by excessive expectations of users.
Unreasonable because the promotion is to let more users understand and use the product, improve brand awareness and market share, and the deduction of fees without promotion is not only immoral, but also makes users lose trust in the product. In addition, whether the gravitational cube has the conditions for deducting fees and the service content should also be fully publicized, so that users can make an informed choice.
If a fee is required, the quality of service and the rights and interests of users should be guaranteed.
It is inadequate and unfair.
Because if the gravitational Rubik's cube has not been promoted, consumers do not have enough understanding of its quality and effect in advance, and charging fees will cause consumers to pay for it without obtaining the expected effect, which is a certain risk and unfair phenomenon.
If it is a trial period, consumers can try it first, and then consider buying after satisfaction, which is more in line with the law of the market and the interests of consumers.
Inadequate and unreasonable.
Because the gravitational cube is an emerging technology product, for consumers, they must first understand the performance, function, cost performance and other aspects of the product before making a purchase decision. If the mandatory deduction is made before the promotion, it not only lacks sufficient information transparency, but also violates the basic principles of the market economy. In addition, such behavior may also trigger consumer dissatisfaction and boycott, which will have a negative impact on the company's image and market prospects.
Suggested that gravity Cube first promote the product, let consumers understand its real performance and advantages, and then consider the price and other aspects of the problem.