Each of the 16 countries has its own characteristics, the most powerful arms:
One: Egyptian monks
The Egyptian monks were without a doubt the most attractive soldiers in Rome. If you have monks in your army, everything about war becomes unpredictable. It is possible that a single ascending Egyptian monk could destroy a powerful empire. If used well, its effect is unpredictable and can be said to be unlimited. Let us suppose that there is a possibility that there is a team of monks against an equal number of chariots. At this point, 1\/4 of the monks use a quick summon, while the other 3\/4 of the monks use three men to summon an enemy. Due to the extra 6 fields of view, although the tank shot has the ability to resist recruitment, it will also be quickly recruited. Let's assume that the author has the ability to work close to a computer. This way, when most of the summoning is over, 3\/4 of the monks are still alive, plus as many tank shots as the enemy. At this time, even without medical treatment, you can certainly defeat the other side.
Similarly, against the crossbow and catapult, the Egyptian monks had a unique opportunity that no other race could. But if you want to use monks well, it's important. If done well, it is very likely to achieve a great victory, but their own loss is very small. Of course, this does not mean that the Egyptian monks were invincible. It simply means that the Egyptian monks had a power unmatched by any other army.
Two: The Persian War elephant
The Persians were the most comprehensive army in Rome. Although he could not beat the Centurion in a single fight, the Centurion was no match for him in a group fight. And his powerful siege ability is not a centurion. His weight is also slightly inferior to Carthage's weight, but because of its high mobility, it has less time to move and adjust in battle, and can also gain the upper hand in group fights. In addition, the strong moving force makes him have an impact force comparable to gold armor. Without protection, a team of Persian elephants could easily charge a team of crossbows. As for the trebuchet, the heavy elephant can beat him too. Of course, the bowmen could hang him slowly. However, this assumes that the bowman can run all the time. But unfortunately there is no terrain in Rome without obstacles. In addition, the heavy elephant has enough power to hold out until it can surround the bowmen. His weakness, of course, was his inability to stand up to the monks.
Three: Macedonian centurion
The Macedonian centurions are arguably second only to the Persian heavy elephants. In the presence of infantry, cavalry, and bowmen, he was almost as beaten as the heavy elephant. And he has the ability to resist recruitment, which is still on top of the heavy image. Of course, the opponent can still beat the centurion with a monk if he wants to, which is why he can't rank ahead of the monk. At the same time, he is also difficult to defeat the crossbow, and the siege is not as good as the heavy elephant, so he should also be ranked after the heavy elephant. Four: Sumerian trebuchet
The trebuchet's ability to fight alone is poor, and single-arm combat is not his strong point, so it is difficult to assess his ability. But given that the next unit is not his opponent, he can be ranked in this position. The reason I chose Sumer over Hittite is because I think attack power is more important for a trebuchet. Because if the trebuchet doesn't keep the enemy at bay, no amount of blood will matter.
Five: Carthage War Elephant Archer
The Carthaginian archer was arguably the strongest bow in Rome, and he was also the strongest long-range weapon in a single fight. However, since he could only attack one enemy at a time, he was unable to defeat the trebuchet in slightly larger numbers. But because his vitality is very high, even some of the close troops are not his match.
Six: Swordsman of the Roman regiment
The Roman cutlass is arguably one of the most obvious of all the advantages. Although he had to be at least 3:2 in a group fight to win the Egyptian two-headed horse, but because of his extremely low price, coupled with excellent arrow resistance, and only half the population, he could play a numerical advantage against any class. It can be said that in addition to the image shooting, including heavy horse shooting, any bow soldiers may be surrounded by him.
Seven: Egyptian two-headed horse
If the fighting method of the short sword is \"10,000 ants eat the elephant\
Eight: Yamato Golden Armor cavalry
The golden armor was undoubtedly the most powerful weapon in the Roman revival. But Yamato was also the only race in the Roman revival where gold armor had an advantage. Its balanced offensive and defensive capabilities, rapid mobility and unmatched vitality are extremely powerful. He is also the only advanced melee fast soldier in the original version. But the presence of camel soldiers and two-headed horses greatly limited his ability to move from bronze to iron. Especially the appearance of two-headed horses, so that Jinjia completely lost its original status. Maybe the two-headed horse's ability to attack multiple people is a failure?
Nine: Hittite heavy cavalry archer
Although Yamato also has excellent heavy mounted shooting, but compared with the golden Jia, or the influence of the golden Jia. In addition, the Hittite heavy riding shot of the single ability is also stronger. Sure, Yamato's gonna beat Hitai at 5-4. So Hitai's army should not be in front of Yamato.
Ten: Yin Shang villagers
Although almost all races have some kind of class advantage, almost all players will admit that the Yin Shang without any class advantage is one of the most powerful races. This is because the villagers of the Shang Dynasty were the greatest villagers in Rome. This advantage can be compared with the advantage of any ethnic group's arms, so there should be a share of Yinshang villagers in this ranking.
National iron age
Egyptian Elephant Bow (full Tech) Two-headed horse (full Tech, enhanced), War Elephant Monk (full Tech, enhanced =16)
Greek Heavy Cavalry Heavy catapult (full tech =15), Ballista (full tech =12) Centurion (enhanced) Monk (=13)
Babylon Black Riding two-headed horse, War Elephant Heavy trebuchet (Full Tech =15) Legion Warrior Monk (Enhanced, full Tech =13)
Assyrian Black Rider (enhanced) Gold Cavalry Monk (full tech =13) Heavy catapult (=13), Company Ballista (=10) Legion soldier
Kritter Bow (enhanced =12) Heavy catapult (full tech =15), Ballista (full tech =12) Centurion (full tech)
Hittite Gold Black Ride (full, enhanced) Elephant Bow (Enhanced) Two-head horse (full) Armored Gold Elephant (full) Heavy trebuchet (Enhanced, complete =15\/300) Centurion (full)
Phoenician Elephant bow two-headed horse, armored Golden Elephant Centurion monk (full tech =13)
Sumi Gold Black riding two-headed horse, war elephant heavy trebuchet (enhanced, full tech =15) centurion
Persian Gold Black Ride, Elephant Bow (enhanced) Gold Cavalry (All Tech), Armored Gold Elephant (All Tech, enhanced) Medium trebuchet (=14) Legion Soldier (All Tech) Monk (All Tech =13)
Shang Dynasty Gold and Black riding two-headed horse (full tech), Gold Cavalry (full tech) Medium catapult (=12), Ballista (=10) Monk (full tech =13)
Japanese Gold Black Rider (All Tech) Gold Cavalry (All Tech) Centurion (All Tech)
Korean Black Rider Gold Cavalry Company Ballista (=10) Legion Soldier (enhanced) Monk (full tech =13)
Roman two-headed horse (all-Tech) Legion soldier (All-Tech, enhanced) Heavy catapult (=15), Ballista (=12) Centurion (all-Tech) monk
Carthage Black Horse, Elephant Bow (enhanced) Heavy Iron Horse, Armored Golden Elephant (enhanced) Company Balista Centurion (enhanced)
Hebrew Gold Black riding two-headed horse, armored Gold elephant (full tech) Heavy catapult (=13), Ballista (=9)
Macedonian Gold Black Riding gold cavalry, armored gold elephant (full tech) Ballista (=9) centurion
National bronze era
Egyptian chariot bow (enhanced), strong bow riding (enhanced), camel trebuchet heavy soldiers
Greek cavalry trebuchet Heavy troopers (enhanced)
Babilun charioteer bow, strong bow ride, iron ride, camel trebuchet heavy soldiers
Assyrian bow (reinforced) chariot, iron horse, camel trebuchet heavily armed soldiers
Crete strong bow (reinforced) Iron horse, camel trebuchet heavy soldiers
Hittite bow (enhanced) Chariot ride, iron ride, camel trebuchet (enhanced) heavily armed soldiers
Phoenician chariot bow, strong bow riding, camel trebuchet heavy soldiers
Soviet-american bow riding, camel trebuchet (reinforced) heavily armed troops
Persian strong bow iron ride, camel trebuchet
Shang chariot bow, strong bow riding, iron riding, camel trebuchet heavy armed soldiers
Japanese strongbow cavalry trebuchet heavily loaded troops
Korean longbow cavalry trebuchet heavy armed soldier monk
Roman longbow rider, iron rider broadsword soldier (enhanced) trebuchet heavy soldier
Carthaginian longbow iron horse, camel trebuchet heavily armed troops (enhanced)
Hebrew bow, strong bow ride, iron ride, camel (reinforced) trebuchet heavy soldiers
Macedonian Bow, Camel trebuchet (=10) Heavily armed troops (enhanced)
The Roman Empire conquered many countries and peoples during its great power. But if Rome had to choose a country that could benefit the Roman Empire, it should have chosen a country with a strong military, rich resources, and cultural heritage.
For example, Egypt, as an ancient country with rich resources and cultural heritage, could provide Rome with valuable trade resources and cultural exchanges. Germany, as a powerful nation, could provide Rome with strong military strength and security. Therefore, choosing these countries with strength and cultural background could bring better development and stability to the Roman Empire.